Nikon Z System News and Commentary
Space Turns into a Cloud
Nikon Image Space (NIS), Nikon’s long-neglected, underutilized, under marketed, and almost not-there cloud initiative, is going the way of the dodo on October 15th.
In an email to Nikon Image Space customers (not all of whom received it yet), Nikon announced what’s about to happen:
- 10/15/26: all features on Nikon Image Space except for bulk download will be terminated.
- 4/15/27: all data will be permanently deleted.
So basically if you were using NIS, you have until the next US tax day to download your data.
Meanwhile, Nikon Imaging Cloud (NIC) will gain 5GB of image storage and sharing capability on October 14th, 2026, the day before the NIS shutdown begins.
This is not unexpected. Nikon’s sprawling software suite was out-of-control, and requires too many hoops to jump through for most users to take advantage of everything Nikon was offering. We’ll see if this helps. But because Nikon almost never brings direct customer feedback into the processes that update all this stuff, we need to see the finished results before deeming this any kind of success. The current process for connecting your camera to NIC is pretty convoluted, for instance, so I’m not sure if the NIS termination is more about just some internal group consolidation or actually trying to fix and extend the user experience of camera-to-cloud.
I do have some issues with Nikon’s email, though, as it shows once again that they’re not particularly customer-aware. The email says “storage and image sharing features of [NIS] will be added to [NIC].” Great, but what, exactly does that mean? The first question out of almost every customers’ mouth would be “will you transfer my images over?” There’s no answer to that question at the moment, and the “encouragement” to download your currently saved images from NIS seems to suggest they won’t be.
Here’s the email Nikon should have sent:
“In order to provide a better service and experience to our customers, we have decided to combine NIS and NIC. The result will end up under the NIC name, as all of our current cameras now support NIC directly. The benefit to you will be a simpler system of moving your images to the cloud and storing them. We’ll continue to provide 5GB of free space for you to do that, and by consolidating the two previous services we’ll be making it easier for you to use that.”
And from there, go on to describe the timing and details.
Mastering Nikon Video
That’s right, I have a new book available: Mastering Nikon Video.
My latest book is intended for Z System camera users that struggle with understanding what Nikon did to support video, and how to get the best video results out of their camera. Yes, Nikon says just flip the Live View switch, but there are a ton of consequences and things to deal with when you flip that switch. This book explains everything you need to know about recording video, and in a way that you can understand.
With Mastering Nikon Video I’m doing something a little different than I normally do. Typically once I’ve finished writing a Mastering book, I both spend some time doing a deeper edit on it as well as pass it by a few well-chosen readers to see if there are things I need to flesh out more. This time, however, I’m releasing the book immediately upon completing the full, initially-edited version. I’m doing that for two reasons:
- “Explain video more” has been the number one book request for quite some time among my customers. They know my visual creator background actually started mostly with filmmaking and video, and they want to learn everything I know about that, not the simple video instructions I provide in my Complete Guides. In releasing this book a bit earlier in my process than I typically do, I’m trying to satisfy all that pent up demand I’ve been ignoring.
- I have several aspects of the book I want to work on more, but I’m first curious as to whether readers agree with what those are or have other video issues they want me to address. I’d rather spend my next writing efforts filling in gaps or adding explanations that you need rather than relying upon my own ideas of what might benefit from some more work. Since I provide free updates when I do revise a work, you’re not really losing anything by getting this early version.
I should emphasize, while this is an early version, it’s a complete, finished book. I step through everything you need to know, providing both background and reasons why things are as they are in Nikon’s video implementation. That means addressing every VIDEO RECORDING menu option and every g Video Custom Setting. But it also means a complete history and explanation about frame sizes, frame rates, compression, plus much more. Three additional areas of typical confusion (exposure, focus, and tonal choices) are all dealt with directly with their own chapters. I’m confident that everyone who gets this book will be learning something about Nikon video that they don’t already know.
While the printed page count may seem short (~270 pages in paperback PDF format [I also supply an ePub file for ereaders]), I’ve tried to be direct and concise with this book, as I want you to really read it from start to finish. Again, I have my own ideas about where I might eventually expand and elaborate it for future versions, but I really want to hear your opinions before I tackle fleshing everything I can out of the “mastering video” title.
30 fps and be there...
Oh Dear, NikonUSA, What Have You Done?
Update: Nikon eventually restored the All capability and table-view as the default. So a temporary disruption. One of the joys of updating Web sites is that sometimes the wrong behaviors get resurfaced.
I was doing some research for my next book and went to the NikonUSA Web site to look up a lens. As I often do I clicked on All lenses. What I got was a table of 15 lenses. Wait, what?
It turns out that NikonUSA has redesigned this section of their site, now allowing a tiled view, list view, and table view. List view (which is really a list-plus-more view) and Tiled view say they'll show you all lenses, but don’t. The old default Table view currently only shows 15 items at a time, and the Next Page indicator is not visible on my Retina display without scrolling. Actually, it’s below the footnotes, which aren’t short, and it simply is a 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, which I guess the designers hope the site visitor will interpret as page number. And by the way, a default of “sort by lens mount” produces lens lists in a seemingly random order. Oopsie.
None of the camera makers seem to know how to help site visitors see the current promoted items (the marketing messages) while still easily navigating to something specific. It’s not an easy problem to solve. NikonUSA hasn’t solved it, and this iteration is worse than before.
As many of you know, I’m in the middle of site redesigning myself, so I’m keenly sensitive to the problems site developers run into. In particular, Google’s insistence that all sites have to be fully display responsive leads to all kinds of issues and now has us all locked in doomscrolling to find things. The more things you need to have present on your site, the bigger the problems become as you try to deal with both mobile and desktop. And then there’s light (daytime) and dark (nighttime) modes to be dealt with, too.
Complex, complicated, deep, broad, and detailed information is really tough to do right in a way that the site visitor immediately has an idea what to do, where they can go, and how they can get there.
Where Have the BIG Firmware Releases Gone?
Z9 owners were regularly treated to a “new camera” via the massive firmware releases that periodically added features and customizations. This near constant iteration resulted in a lot of positive press for Nikon, and established the Z9 as a critical pro tool with ever-expanding abilities.
Ironically, the last truly big Z9 update was from version 5.20 to 5.30 back in December of last year, and it did not address a number of things still missing in the Z9 that other Z9-generation cameras now have (apparently no Z9 user needs to get their images to the cloud, let alone a Nikon cloud). So all that positive feeling has now started to dissipate. Even more so because big firmware updates for other cameras haven’t been happening this year, either.
ZR users, for instance, have expected some of the key missing “cinema” elements to be addressed, but in the almost year since the camera appeared we’ve only gotten a few modest bug fixes. Bug fixes are always welcome, but just as with the seminal Z9, Nikon received a plethora of feedback that should have driven bigger firmware updates with the ZR, as well. We just haven’t really seen any reaction out of Tokyo (or is it Los Angeles?) yet.
This is a tricky territory to navigate (firmware updates, that is). On the one hand, if you save “big” features, functions, and performance changes up, the next full iteration of a model looks more impressive and has more things marketing can do some AI slop on in the eventual press release (Nikon’s press releases are now so formulaic, I can write them in my sleep, so an AI should be able to do this tout suite [hmm, another article idea]). On the other hand, serious users buying US$2000+ cameras aren’t buying every generation of a camera, but still want to feel like their brand is not neglecting them as tech keeps ticking onward.
As readers of my sites know, I’m an advocate of skipping generations. Don’t buy every generation of a camera (e.g. Z6, Z6II, and Z6III). Buy a product, use it through a complete update cycle and rejoin the buying with the subsequent later cycle (e.g. Z6, then Z6III). Cameras have been remarkably good for almost two decades now, so chasing incremental improvements really doesn’t pay off. You need a major platform change to get useful things.
Or you need a Big Firmware Update ;~).
Nikon has been hoist on their own petard at this point, though that tends to get misrepresented by many. Many felt the big firmware updates with the Z9 that uncovered a slew of new features and kept me busy updating my book was a sign that Nikon was listening to users and improving their product willingly.
Not exactly. As many of you may remember, I characterized it differently. The Z9 hardware was ready before the Z9 firmware was. Nikon shipped the initial camera with quite a few things that had been on the software critical path left out, then kept the firmware team executing until they had finally caught up with all the originally intended features. Coupled with that, they did listen better and incorporate some user suggestions along the way, including a couple of mine, but the primary reason we got big firmware updates was that the Z9 wasn’t finished when it was launched.
And again, the Z9 still isn’t finished. Nikon Imaging Cloud, Flexible Picture Controls, several Custom Settings, HEIF support, and a few more items have appeared on subsequent Z9-generation cameras but never made it to the progenitor. I’m sure a Z9II will pick up those things, and thus the slipped schedule of the Z9II may be the reason why we didn’t get a Z9 firmware 6.0 to incorporate them, as the Z9II was supposed to happen sooner.
Coupled with no new cameras in a year, the decline in big firmware updates means that Nikon hasn’t much to crow about on the camera front. Correct that: they’ve had nothing to squawk about. Connect that with price increases and Nikon PR has had a bad year. Is it a wonder that sales are down from forecasts?
Let me conclude by offering my thoughts on the coming months. I suspect that we will get another big firmware update this fall or winter, and specifically for the ZR. Nikon needs to shore up some things on their only current cinema camera if they want to hold serve. But other than that, I think it won’t be until the Z9II hits that we see anything else on the feature, function, customization, or performance side that is significant. We’ve just gone through a cycle of bug fix updates for most models, and nothing new appeared during that, so I believe Nikon is holding the Next Big Things for the Z9II launch at this point.
And of course you’re going to start peppering me with questions about when that will be. My best estimate has been and continues to be start-of-the-new-year plus or minus a month. In other words December 2026 through February 2027. However, as I’ve talked with manufacturers, suppliers, and others in the know recently, we’ve had multiple cameras postponed in 2026, not just from Nikon. The memory shortage is obviously not helping, but I’ve seen reports of several other components that are causing severe timing issues for the camera companies. So my Z9II expected date may slip further. Still, my current estimate is somewhere very near the year changeover; I haven’t yet heard anything that would change that prediction.
Here’s the real problem Nikon is facing. It’s not the lack of big firmware updates. It’s not delays in shipping new products. Nope, it’s really the fact that in long periods of quiet as we’re currently experiencing, the lack of any Nikon marketing messaging erodes confidence in the user base. Users wonder whether or not there’s a bigger issue with their brand of choice. Particularly when other companies that recently passed Nikon by—(cough) Sony—seem to be more active and moving forward with interesting products and messages.
I’ve written it before: Nikon is their own worst enemy, and that starts with product marketing and extends to all marketing and customer relations. The real issue is that there’s no consistency to Nikon’s messaging, and they often go into complete periods of message lapse that worries their best customers, and each time that happens it causes a few more to leak to other brands. Nikon did not really address this issue in the DSLR era, and now that’s extended well into the mirrorless era. It’s a fundamental flaw in their organization and management, and one that doesn’t play in the current world expectation of overcommunication.
—————
Bonus coverage: On a related note, it has now been almost three months since the development announcement for the 120-300mm f/2.8 TC VR S. The most likely user of this lens, the sports photographer, is just starting up their big fall schedules, and once you’re into that cycle, you’re not really looking to update or add to your gear, as your hands are full just going from game to game and delivering images to clients. Several Nikon-wielding sports pros have been asking me “when will this lens appear?” That’s a little tricky, in that development announcements tend to happen three to six months prior to actual launch. We’re just about to head into that window, so it could be any time in the next month or two. But again, the silence is not helping Nikon, and delivering in October would be a big miss in terms of when that lens would have been most appreciated and purchased. And if it slips past December delivery, it would be a huge miss, in that it would miss year-end tax write-offs for this same group. Put a different way, anything past December would reduce the urgency at which the sports professional might consider picking up this lens.
Things aren’t helped by the fact that Nikon doesn’t have a D500 update in the Z-mount (e.g. Z70 or Z90 speed-oriented camera). The 120-300mm (and 420mm with the teleconverter invoked) has very solid use cases for sports with FX bodies, but those users alone would limit the upside of that lens. 120-300mm (and 420mm with teleconverter) would be a solid wildlife lens on DX, expanding the sales market, as it would be effectively 180-450mm f/2.8 with a 630mm f/4 option.
So once again I have to take issue with the coordination of product planning between the camera group and the NIKKOR lens group: it’s like they’re not on the same page. The sum of the parts (cameras, lenses) should actually be greater than the sum of the parts when product management gets their job done correctly. I’ll note that Nikon missed their goal of a 2:1 attachment rate (two lenses sold for every camera sold), and is mired down just under the historical 1.5:1 rate. What I’m writing about here is one of the reasons for that result. Nikon’s lack of marketing messaging of any note is another. (I’m sure Nikon will blame it on component shortages, tariffs, and other things, but they’re wrong: the real issue lives in the corporate offices and could be seen by installing a mirror.)
The Number One Question I’m Getting
Every year this time I get the questions about when Nikon will release their next camera (or lens). That’s because the Z-mount customer has been conditioned to expect fall releases. The over/under for camera releases by Nikon is August. In the past they’ve released six cameras in the April to July time frame, and seven in the September to November time frame (the original Z6/Z7 were announced exactly in between, in August.
The queries are a bit stronger this year, as Nikon hasn’t introduced any camera since the ZR last September, and no still-oriented camera since the Z5II in April 2025. Moreover, the Z9II is overdue, as it missed the usual four-year pro update cycle.
As I’ve been writing all year, I don’t expect Nikon’s next camera announcement until after Labor Day. And now we see a hint of that in the Nikon Q1 financials just released: “downward revision to the 1H sales plan” is a clear clue that nothing sigificant gets released in the July through September quarter (e.g. even a September announcement may not ship to customers until October). It’s not a big thing, but Nikon took out about 50,000 camera units from their fiscal year forecast, which is about what I’d expect from not shipping anything new in Q2 (July to September). Essentially, delays in new product introductions seem to be pushing volume into the next fiscal year, as lenses also saw a 50,000 unit reduction.
Nikon is claiming these reductions are also due to overall digital camera sales declines in China (marketwide, not just Nikon), but typically new product introductions tend to goose the numbers about the way Nikon originally forecast and is now discounting. Given Nikon’s new fiscal volume estimates, I’d have to guess that one new camera ships in the Q3 time frame (October to December), and another in Q4 (January to March, 2027). That’s pretty much onboard with what I’ve been hearing and writing about all year: one fall intro, one late 26/early 27 intro.
One final note on the Q1 numbers: imaging products inventories has been slow growing (about 6% over the past year). Nothing worrisome, but if that continues I’d expect to see more aggressive discounting in the Christmas selling season.
Will We Get Unique NIKKORs Again?
So here’s a question to ask yourself: what NIKKOR lens currently stands out as unique across all mounts these days?
Answer: 50mm f/0.95 NOCT.
Runner Ups: the 135mm f/1.8 Plena, 600mm f/6.3 VR S, and 800mm f/6.3 VR S.
Also considered: 28-400mm f/4-8 VR, 28-135mm f/4 PZ.
There was a time back in the film SLR and DSLR F-mount cycles when Nikon was continuous iterating truly unique lenses that no one else had: first zoom, first autofocus lens, first exotic telephotos, first 17-35mm f/2.8, first, first, first. And often times, those lenses stayed unique for a period of years.
With the Z-mount Nikon seems gone more conservative and mainstream with their NIKKOR offerings. Instead of unique focal lengths and apertures, which drives different uses, we instead have seen Nikon opt for highest possible performance at well-known focal lengths and aperture combinations that are known to sell in quantity.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not complaining about the quality of Nikon’s Z-mount offerings. With very few exceptions they’ve all turned out to be at or near best-in-class, and edge-to-edge sharpness with few other drawbacks makes for detailed, sharp, and anomaly-free images. I’m all for that.
What’s missing this time around seems to be true creativity in optics: designing lenses that just haven’t existed before, or which push extremes more extremely, as does the NOCT, which is probably the best testing lens to ever hit the byThom labs. Likewise, the 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S put exotic telephotos on notice that there’s a new standard in town, though I don’t judge it to be pushing extremes too extremely (Sony’s 400mm f/2.8 is close).
We have had an odd couple of lens incidentals that now seem to be abandoned. For instance, the OLED display on some of the top S lenses now seems to be a thing of that past (as it should be). At the time some thought it to be a step forward, but my eye is not hovering over the lens barrel, and if the information is available to the lens barrel where I can’t see it, it should also be available in the camera’s displays, right? Oops. Misfire.
What strikes me is that so many of Nikon’s unique F-mount lenses never made it to mirrorless:
- 8-15mm f/3.5-4.5E fisheye zoom — solved four use cases in one lens
- 16mm f/2.8 fisheye — created and fulfilled the full-frame fisheye standard for years
- 17-35mm f/2.8D — at the time, outside the parameters of what you could find elsewhere, and coveted
- 20-35mm f/2.8D — a forgotten lens that seems pretty well suited to the creator era
- 35-135mm f/3.5-4.5 — yes, Nikon was there early; Tamron has now usurped the spot with a faster lens
- 70-180mm f/4.5-5.6D Micro-NIKKOR — hands down the most interesting and practical macro lens I’ve used
- 180mm f/2.8 — smaller and lighter than the 70-200mm f/2.8 when you just needed something fast near 200mm
- 180-400mm f/4E TC — no, the 120-300mm f/2.8 TC isn’t going to solve the same problem; and this lens was Nikon’s followup to the popular 200-400mm f/4, one of the great all-around wildlife lenses
- 200mm f/4D Micro-NIKKOR — about 75,000 users wonder why this lens was left to die in D-dom
- any PC-E lens — sure, not a big seller, but tilt-shift establishes a camera use well beyond what we can do with current Z-mount lenses
The reason for the lack of more unique lenses in the Z-mount almost certainly is due to bean counters. A few of the lenses I just listed did sell well, but many had smaller customer bases that Nikon may now be afraid of in the current “everything must return instant profit” era.
One question I now have is this: if Nikon were to suddenly get their path-blazing design mojo back, exactly what would that lens or lenses be? The problem now is that Canon, Sigma, Sony, and Tamron have all been nibbling away at unique opportunities, so a lot of “different” lenses Nikon might consider today would now look more copycat than unique.
Again, I have no problem at all with what Nikon has produced so far in the Z-mount. Most of my needs are now met by lenses better than I used before. And as I age out, my actual needs are narrowing (to lenses I already own). There’s perhaps six to eight lenses that really belong in my gear closet now, though I have a few more. And those six to eight are covered by existing NIKKORs just fine.
Still, I wonder what would happen if Nikon let their optical engineers off their tight bean-counting leash. After all, in the past Nikon was putting out lenses that allowed us to do new things photographically on a pretty regular basis. I still remember the first mountain bike photographer discovering the 16mm f/2.8 fisheye and how that impacted the editorial market almost instantly. As Sontag so clearly explained, photography gets stale if you just do the same old things the same way as the past practitioner has been doing. Even the Insta and Toker communities are discovering that the hard way these days.
Thus my challenge to the NIKKOR group at Nikon is simple: show us the optics that allow us to do things we haven’t been able to do before, and I’ll show you my credit card.