Categorizing The Z Nikkors

Now that we've got a fair representation of optics from Nikon in the Z mount, it's possible to start separating them out into overall optical quality categories. I'm not going to try to do this in too discrete a level, though. Indeed, I've really only seen three levels that I can clearly distinguish so far (for my reviews of these lenses, click here):

Exceptional
This category is reserved for lenses where Nikon's engineers simply hit the ball out of the park (they'll appreciate the baseball metaphor, I'm sure). I'm never unhappy when using any of these lenses. Their "faults" are non-existent, or minimal, or easily fixed, and the acuity they produce on a Z7 is incredibly good.

  • 24-70mm f/2.8 S — The best mid-range zoom I've seen from anybody, and there are now a few really good ones out there, including Sony's GM.
  • 50mm f/1.8 S — It barely makes it into this category, but this is a 50mm that gets up near legendary Otus capability, which has to count for something.
  • 58mm f/0.95 NOCT — You probably could have guessed this lens would be in this category: the NOCT was clearly a statement of what Nikon can do when completely let free in design.
  • 70-200mm f/2.8 S — The best telephoto zoom I've seen from anybody, and again, there are a few really good ones out there now, including Nikon's own 70-200mm f/2.8E.

Excellent
I put lenses in this category that I find do what I need them to do, but don't quite reach the exceptional level. Thus, some of my statements change a little bit: I'm almost never unhappy with using any of these lenses; their "faults" are minimal, usually fixable, and again the acuity is quite good on a Z7.

  • 20mm f/1.8 S — This lens just squeezes into the category, but still, it's a really nice lens with few liabilities.
  • 85mm f/1.8 S — This is clearly the best 85mm f/1.8 Nikon has made; it has a lot of competition from others, though.

Very Good
When my worst category is "very good," you know that Nikon is doing something right. The difference here is that you probably do need to be aware of these lens' strengths and weaknesses. 

  • 14-30mm f/4 S — A bit weaker in the corners than I'd like, but still a great travel lens.
  • 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 — Lots of small things to watch for, but in terms of a kit lens, this lens is near the top.
  • 24mm f/1.8 S — Compared to the other f/1.8 S primes, this one has more attributes you need to watch out for.
  • 24-70mm f/4 S — One of the best kit lenses I've ever seen. Highly competent, just not exceptionally so.
  • 24-200mm f/4-6.3 — In terms of superzooms, it's one of the best I've seen. I do think people are giving it a bit more credit than it deserves, though. Like the other lenses in this category, it has a few weak points you need to be aware of.
  • 35mm f/1.8 S — I was tempted to put this lens in the Excellent category, but let's just say that it tops the Very Good category. One of Nikon's best 35mm optics, it just doesn't quite reach to the levels the 20mm and 85mm achieved in this first go around.
  • 50-250mm f/4.5-6.3 — Probably the weakest of the lenses in this category, but it's also trying to do a lot (5x zoom is difficult to nail all the parts down on compared to 2x or 3x). I prefer the 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 AF-P on the FTZ adapter to this lens, but you'd pay more, and have more bulk/weight to deal with. 

As new Z Nikkors continue to appear and I get enough experience with them to establish an informed opinion on them, I'll add them to the appropriate section of this page. I may also create new categories, or in hopefully rare cases, move a lens from one category to another. So be sure to check back. 

text and images © 2020 Thom Hogan — All Rights Reserved
Follow us on Twitter: @bythom, hashtags #bythom, #zsystemuser
other related sites: bythom.com, dslrbodies.com, sansmirror.com, filmbodies.com